Optimal Director Salary for 2026
-
Richard Jackson - 27/04/2026

Does the “Salary + Dividend” Approach Still Work?
Yes but there are a few key considerations.
The structure still works.
But what it achieves and where it stops is often misunderstood.
Why Not Take 100% Dividends?
Dividends can look attractive:
- no National Insurance
- lower headline tax rates
But they come with a key limitation:
Dividends are not deductible for Corporation Tax.
They’re paid from post-tax profits.
So the company pays Corporation Tax first, and then you pay dividend tax personally, creating a layered tax effect.
Why Not Take 100% Salary?
At the other end, you could take everything as salary.
This reduces Corporation Tax, because salary is deductible.
But it introduces:
- Income Tax
- Employee National Insurance
- Employer’s National Insurance
And once salary increases, these combined costs typically outweigh the Corporation Tax saving.
Why the Salary + Dividend Blend Still Works
The reason this structure continues to exist is simple:
It balances two imperfect systems.
- Salary reduces Corporation Tax but triggers Employers NIC
- Dividends avoid NIC but are paid from taxed profits
So using both tends to produce the lowest overall tax cost.
What Else Can Be Done to Improve Tax Efficiency?
The Profit
Extraction Problem
Why profitability agency founders quietly cap personal wealth.

The Typical 2026/27 Structure
For most owner-directors, the baseline remains:
- Salary: £12,570
- Dividends: make up the balance of remuneration
This:
- uses the personal allowance
- keeps income within the basic rate band
- avoids unnecessary National Insurance
From a single-year perspective, this still works well.
Key Considerations
1. If you have other taxable income such as rental property then often we would look to reduce the Director Salary by the taxible profits generated from property income.
2. If you don't generate post-tax profits high enough to declare a dividend. Typically if you are in the early years or investment period and require funding to launch the business you will not have profits from which to declare a dividend. In this case tax efficiency is less important and 100% of your remuneration will likely come from Salary.
3. Why pay a salary at all? Is it only for tax efficency? No, paying a salary above the lower earnings limit for National Insurance ensures you have a qualifying year for state pension.
4. Although £12,570 is the threshold at which you start paying National Insurance as an employee as an employer (which you will be) the company has to pay NI on salaries over £5k. It is however still worthwhile due to corporation tax to incur a small amount of employers NI each year.
5. Always review if you can qualify for Employer Allowance whcih provides 100% relief of Employers NI for the first £10,500 if eligable.
What Else Can Be Done to Improve Tax Efficiency?
Once this baseline is in place, the next step isn’t usually changing the mix.
It’s understanding what sits alongside it.
Pension Contributions from the Company
One of the simplest extensions is employer pension contributions.
These are:
- deductible for Corporation Tax
- not subject to National Insurance
- not taxed personally when paid in
Which makes them a highly efficient way to extract value, with the trade-off of access being restricted.
Using More Than One Tax Year
Another area that starts to matter is timing.
Instead of taking the same income every year, varying it can change outcomes.
For example:
- taking £100k one year and £150k the next
- instead of £100k in both
can result in:
- more total income extracted
- without a proportionate increase in tax
This is explored further here:
Download our Free Guide
The Profit Extraction Problem
Why profitable agency founders quietly cap personal wealth.



